Does The New Millennium Begin January 1, 2000 Or January 1, 2001?

Many people believe that the new millennium will begin in the year 2000, and many people believe that it will begin in the year 2001. Who is right?

The answer, in the opinion of this author, is that both groups of people can consider themselves to be right. At the same time, neither group should consider the other to be wrong, but should recognize that the other group counts from a different, yet also valid, perspective.

This is a much, and sometimes very hotly, debated topic. It seems that the followers of the 2001 theory claim that their date is 'more' correct, 'technically' correct, 'historically' correct, etc., and that the other view is therefore incorrect. At the same time, it seems that the followers of the 2000 theory claim that their date is also, although perhaps not exclusively, correct. These people know what they believe, even if they don't have the 'scientific' voice of authority to support them.

Why The New Millennium Can Be Considered To Begin January 1, 2001

The Julian calendar was instituted by Julius Caesar more than 2,000 years ago, in what is now known as 46 B.C. More than 800 years later, in the time of Charlemagne, it was officially decided to renumber the years of the Julian calendar, beginning with the supposed birth of Christ. At that time, European counting was based on a decimal system, with ten basic numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. At that time, there was no number 0.

The first year of this calendar was identified by the first number in the number system, the number 1. The first decade ('deca' = ten in Greek) therefore ended with the tenth number, 10. The first century ('cent' = hundred in Latin) therefore ended with the end of the tenth decade, with the hundredth number, 100. The first millennium ('mille' = thousand in Latin) therefore ended with the end of the tenth century, with the thousandth number, 1000.

Following this reasoning, the year 1990 would be considered not the first year of the decade of the 90's, but the last year of the decade of the 80's, and the year 2,000 would be considered not the first year of the third millennium, but the last year of the second millennium.

This is a reasonable and valid way to believe. There is historical justification for this. Most, is not all, official time organizations, such as the Greenwich Royal Observatory and the U.S. Naval Observatory, use this justification as the 'correct' line of reasoning.

Why The New Millennium Can Be Considered To Begin January 1, 2000

Why would people want to celebrate the beginning of the new millennium in the year 2,000? And why would they want to do so in the face of criticism from the 'authorities', who present their 'authoritative' and 'official' justification for the year 2001?

The year 2,000 is esthetically more satisfying, and feels to many people as though it 'should' be correct. Is this feeling arbitrary and poorly justified? Not at all.

The reason why this feeling can be considered to be well founded is that most people recognize that using the year 2001 as the beginning of the millennium, just as using the year 1991 as the beginning of the decade of the 90's, is not 'natural'. Although it was natural when this system of counting was instituted 1,200 years ago, it is no longer so in modern times.

The major reason why this ancient system of counting no longer seems natural to many people is that the modern decimal system is no longer based on the ten numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, but is based on the ten numbers 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. In other words, our modern number system makes use of the number 0.

The number 0 is now the first number in our series of numbers. Modern people are used to having 0 occupy the first position. In our modern writing system, which uses Arabic numerals, the number after 9, 10, is written '10' (one, zero). The 1 indicates that this number is in the second decade (group of 10 numbers), as 1 is the second number in the series. The 0 indicates that, within this decade, this number is the first number in the series.

0 0
1 10 1
22
33
44
55
66
77
88
99

There were four primary units of time in the ancient world; the hour, the day, the month, and the year. As the ancients were unaware of the number 0, each of these units of time began with the number 1.

The hours of the day in ancient Rome did not correlate exactly with modern hours. However, there were then as now 12 hours during the day and another 12 hours during the night. The first hour of the day was numbered 1. The last hour was numbered 12. The night then began with the hour 1, and ended with the hour 12. The month began with day 1, and ended with day 28, 29, 30, or 31, depending on the month. The year began with month 1, and ended with month 12. Years were counted from year 1, which among ancient cultures represented the first year of the reign of a king or a dynasty or a government, and were counted until the king died, or until the dynasty or the government fell.

Ancient Units Of Time

Unit

Start

End

Hour

1

12

Day

1

28, 29, 30, 31

Month

1

12

Year

1

Until the end

In modern times, since the invention of the number 0 and the adoption of Arabic numerals, the units of time have changed. There are two exceptions to this, the days of the month and the months of the year. These are still counted as they have been since ancient times. The reason why these have not changed is that there has never been an opportunity to change them. The months and the days used to represent important religious occurrences. The first month of the year, January, was important in a way that the last month of the year, December, was not and vice versa. Together with the days of the month, these used to mark holy days, with the two words holy and days now combined to form the word holidays. Still today, people have become accustomed to holidays falling on a certain day of the year, and, certainly for religious holidays, it would be difficult to induce people to change these to other dates of the year.

The other modern units of time serve more as a series of placeholders than they do significantly different points in time. For example, each hour of the day no longer has a special significance. People recognize each hour in relation to the other hours, as a continuous series throughout the day, and not as numbers that are important in and of themselves for some religious service.

Therefore, the counting of modern units of time has evolved to follow the form of the modern arithmetic counting system. Seconds are the divisions of a minute. Each minute has 60 seconds. As each second is basically no different from each of the other seconds of the minute, each number acts functionally as no more than a placeholder. The 60 seconds of a minute are not counted 1 through 60, but 0 through 59. In the same way, each hour has 60 minutes, and these are numbered 0 through 59. 8:00:00 (8 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds) is considered the beginning of the hour, and not the end of the previous hour.

The hours of the day no longer have their ancient meanings. The day now begins at midnight. It might be expected that the hours would also be renumbered, from 0 to 11. However, the subdivisions of the solar unit of the day (the hours) are intimately related to the subdivisions of the solar unit of the year (the months), and as the months are still counted from 1 to 12, so are the hours. Even though the hours are still numbered from 1 to 12, they are counted as though the highest number, 12, were replaced by 0. In other words, hours are not counted from 1 through 12, but from 12 to 1 through 11. The day begins at the stroke of midnight, 12:00. The 12:00 hour does not represent the last hour of the day. The afternoon begins at the stroke of noon, 12:00. The 12:00 hour does not represent the last hour of the morning. Officially, the years of the modern calendar are still counted as they have been since ancient times, beginning with the year 1. However, the number of the year does not have a fixed end, and is subdivided into sub units for counting; decades, centuries, and millennia. The ancient system of counting is proving itself unsatisfactory to the modern age and modern people, and there is a great tendency for people to want to change the counting system, even if unofficially.

Modern Units Of Time

Unit

Start

End

Day

1

28, 29, 30, 31

Month

1

12

Year (official)

1

10, 100, 1000

Second

0

59

Minute

0

59

Hour

12

11

Year (unofficial)

0

9, 99, 999

The modern emphasis and importance of counting years is different from ancient times. When a new king ascended the throne, or when a new dynasty was founded, or when a new government was founded, a new calendar, or a new era, would begin with year 1 as the '1'st year. Such calendars always oriented toward the past. At year 10, a decade would have completed, and people would celebrate that the king had been on the throne for 10 years. At year 100, a century would complete, and people would celebrate the 100th year of the dynasty or of the government, on the 100th year of the calendar. The people would be celebrating the past, the past 10 or 100 years. When a person reaches 50 years of age, or a marriage reaches 50 years, or a school reunion reaches 50 years, people celebrate the number 50 as the end of a number of years.

Although modern people count years to celebrate the past in the case of birthdays, anniversaries, and reunions, the calendar no longer celebrates the past. People no longer expect the cycle of our calendar to end, but expect it to continue forever. In modern society, people now celebrate the future.

The year 2000, with three zeros, is an esthetically pretty number. Most people wish to celebrate that year. 'Purists' tell them to go ahead and celebrate it, but that what they are celebrating is the end of the millennium, and not the beginning. However, modern people do not celebrate endings, they prefer to celebrate beginnings. Every January 1, it is customary to celebrate the beginning of a new year: It is not instead customary to celebrate December 31 as the end of the old year. In modern society, which uses modern arithmetic, the number 10 is no longer seen as the last of the ten basic numbers, but rather 0 is seen as the first of the ten basic numbers. People wish to celebrate the year 2000, and they wish to celebrate the beginning of the new millennium, not the end of the old one.

Modern units of counting begin with 0 and end with 9; they do not begin with 1 and end with 10. Dollars are counted from 0¢ to 99¢, not from 1¢ to $1.00. When new, car odometers read 00000 miles. When a car odometers passes 99999 miles, and again reaches 00000, people do not celebrate the end of a cycle, they celebrate the beginning of a new cycle.

Modern Counting Units

Unit

Begin

End

Example

Invalid

Numbers

0

9

1000-1099

1001-1100

Dollars

0

99

$1.00-$1.99

$1.01-$2.00

Odometer

00000

99999

00000-99999

00001-00000

Esthetically, it would be more appealing to count the years of the calendar in the same way as we count other units of measurement using modern arithmetic. The year 1990 'should' begin the decade of the 90's, followed by 1991, 1992, etc., rather than ending the decade of the 80's, following 1989, 1988, etc. In the same way, the year 2,000 naturally seems to be more related with the year 2001 than with the year 1999.

Those who claim that 2001 begins the new millennium state that the year 1 was the first year of the calendar. Those who follow the year 2000 don't seem to care. Should they? What if a year 0 were inserted before the year 1, in order to align the calendar to match the modern system of numerals, which begins with the number 0? This is functionally what people seem to be doing. How detrimental could that possibly be?

The year 1 was never actually known by that number during the year itself. It was 800 years later, during the reign of Charlemagne, that it was officially so designated. Why was that year selected as the year 1, and not the year before or after? Because some 500 years after the death of Jesus, a man by the name of Dionysius Exiguus (mis)calculated that that was the year in which Jesus was born. Modern scientists recognize that choice of year to be close, but not exact, and push back the year of Jesus' birth to anywhere from 4 B.C. to as early as 17 B.C. In other words, Jesus was born several years B.C. (Before Christ).

The calendar has been modified many times during its existence. The original Roman calendar had 10 months, and the year began at the spring equinox in March. This is still evidenced by the fact that the 'decem' in December means 10, the 'novem' in November means 9, the 'octo' in October means 8, and the 'septem' in September means 7.

Original Roman Months

Month (English form of name)

Number

Origin of name

March

1

Mars

April

2

Aphrodite

May

3

Maia

June

4

Juno

Quintilis (July)

5

Quint (5) (Julius Caesar)

Sextilis (August)

6

Sex (6) (Augustus)

September

7

Septem(7)

October

8

Octo(8)

November

9

Novem(9)

December

10

Decem (10)

January and February were later added to the beginning of the Roman year, and the beginning of the year was moved back to the winter solstice. The Roman calendar counted years from the legendary founding of the city, now known as 753 B.C. The first year, 753 B.C., was known to the Romans as 1 A.U.C. A.U.C. stands for Ab Urbe Conditae, which means 'from the founding of the city'.

In the year 708 A.U.C. (46 B.C.), Julius Caesar modified the calendar, which was then named after him as the Julian calendar. At that time, the months alternated between long and short months of 31 and 30 days. For political reasons, during the first 50 years of the Julian calendar the lengths of the months were changed to their modern lengths, where February was reduced to 28 days and the months no longer alternate 31 and 30 days. 800 years later, in the time of Charlemagne, the first year of the calendar, the year 1, was officially changed to have begun on January 1 one week after the assumed birthday of Jesus. Pope Gregory modified the calendar in 1582, and the new calendar was renamed the Gregorian calendar after him.

Perhaps the calendar should officially change again, to reflect our modern system of numerals. Whether or not such a change is adopted officially, many, many people already unofficially recognize the year 2000 to be the beginning of the next millennium, the year 1990 to be the beginning of the decade of the 90's, etc.

There have been many unofficial attempts to modify the calendar over the centuries. According to the 'official rules', the years following the birth of Jesus are numbered forward from 1 (1, 2, 3, …), and are followed by the letters A.D. A.D. stands for Anno Domeni, which in Latin means 'in the year of our Lord'. The years preceding the birth of Jesus are numbered backward from 1 (1, 2, 3, …), and are followed by the letters B.C. B.C. stands for Before Christ. There was no year 0.

One unofficial convention that many people follow keeps the year numbers that are associated with B.C. and A.D., yet changes B.C. to B.C.E. and changes A.D. to C.E. Because most scientists no longer believe Jesus to have been born in 1 A.D., and because many people want to separate religion from the calendar, B.C. (Before Christ) is often change to B.C.E. (Before the Common Era, or sometimes Before the Christian Era). A.D. is changed to C.E. (Common Era, or Christian Era).

This solution still does not bring the calendar into line with modern arithmetic. Whereas the distance in space on a number line from +10 to -10 is 20, the distance in time on the calendar from 10 A.D. to 10 B.C. is not 20 years but is 19 years, because there was no year 0.

Another solution was adopted by many astronomers as far back as 250 years ago. This solution removes the A.D. from all years that fall in the past 2000 years. The B.C. is removed from years before that, and is replaced by the negative sign. As well, each year B.C. is shifted by one. In other words, 1 B.C. becomes the year 0, 2 B.C. becomes the year -1, 3 B.C. becomes the year -2, etc.

With this system, the difference between year 10 and year -10 would be 20 years; the calendar would follow the rules of modern arithmetic. With this system, the decade of the 90's would begin in 1990, not 1991, and the third millennium would begin in the year 2000, not 2001. In other words, this system would satisfy the 'natural' feelings of esthetics that develop in modern people who grow up using modern arithmetic and Arabic numerals.

The Julian and Gregorian calendars were enacted over the objections of the common people. The year 46 B.C. was known as the 'year of confusion', as it was lengthened to 445 days in order to bring the calendar back to the 'proper' time. People complained greatly. When the Gregorian calendar was adopted in 1582, 10 days were lost, as October 4 was followed by October 15. When England finally adopted the Gregorian calendar in 1752, 11 days had to be dropped from the month of September, and September 2 was followed by September 14. In the English, and American, version of the modern calendar, the dates September 3-13, 1752 do not exist! The common people were furious and rioted at the presumed loss of their missing days. Thus, throughout history large numbers of days have suddenly been both inserted and deleted from certain years in order to adjust the calendar. The calendar will of course continue to be adjusted in the future.

The insertion of a year zero would greatly simplify and modernize counting of the years, and the change of an arbitrary date errantly selected 1200 years ago for an event that happened 800 years previous to that would not be nearly as traumatic to society as was the adoption of the Julian or the Gregorian calendar. In actual fact, people seem to be making such an adjustment even over the objections of the calendar authorities.

Whether or not the years B.C. become identified as negative numbers, great numbers of people seem to be inserting a year 0 into the calendar, and intend to celebrate the beginning of the third millennium in the year 2000 and not in the year 2001. The Royal Greenwich Observatory and other official organizations cannot officially condone the year 2000 without an official act of law. Common people have no such restriction. Although 'purists' can claim that their year, 2001, is the 'true' and 'correct' year, they should concede that it is correct only to those people who accept it as correct. The system that is used by people with a more modern approach, which recognizes the year 2,000 as the beginning of the next millennium, should also be recognized to be valid.

For more on the nature of time and the evolution of the awareness of time and space throughout the history of the species Homo Sapiens, please visit the website 5dSpace-Time.org.

Dennis Goldwater